Editorial Policy
Last updated: May 2026
SportsHub publishes picks, analysis, and editorial content covering sports betting markets. This page describes the standards we apply to that work β how picks are produced, who reviews them, how we handle conflicts of interest, and how we correct mistakes.
Mission and scope
SportsHub helps readers make informed sports-betting decisions. We do not promise winning outcomes. We commit to accurate, sourced, and reviewed coverage β and to clearly labeling opinion, analysis, and sponsored material when they appear.
Sourcing standards
Factual claims β injury reports, lineups, statistics, odds β must be attributable to a primary or reputable secondary source (team statements, official league data, public regulatory filings, established stats providers).
When we paraphrase reporting from another outlet, we credit the outlet by name and link to the original where possible. Anonymous sources are used sparingly and only when the information is materially newsworthy and cannot be obtained on the record.
How picks are made
Picks are produced by named handicappers and staff writers. Each handicapper's published track record (W-L, ROI, streaks) is visible on the leaderboard. Records are tracked from public pick timestamps β we do not retroactively adjust historical picks.
A pick reflects the author's analysis at the time of publication. It is not a guarantee. Pushes are reported as pushes, not wins. Cancelled or postponed events are excluded from the record.
Editorial review
Long-form articles and analysis pieces are reviewed by an editor before publication. Where applicable, articles also list a fact-checker and the date the fact-check completed. The reviewer and fact-checker are credited on the article alongside the author byline.
Conflicts of interest
Writers and handicappers are required to disclose any material financial relationship with a team, sportsbook, or vendor they cover. Commercial relationships with sportsbook partners do not influence editorial coverage β see our Affiliate Disclosure for details.
Use of AI
We use AI tools for limited tasks β research, summarization, draft assistance, copy editing. All published content is reviewed and approved by a human author or editor. AI is never the sole source of a pick, claim, or factual assertion.
Corrections
If we publish an error, we correct it. Substantive corrections (those that materially change the meaning of an article or pick) are noted with a dated correction line at the bottom of the affected page. See our Corrections page for the full process and how to flag an error.
Questions
Questions about our editorial standards or a specific story? Contact us via the Contact page.